태터데스크 관리자

도움말
닫기
적용하기   첫페이지 만들기

태터데스크 메시지

저장하였습니다.
블로그 이미지
dlpul
소아마비,자폐아,간질,중증 심신장애 등 낫을 수 있어요

calendar

          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Notice

Recent Comment

Recent Trackback

Archive

2020. 4. 25. 11:47 4 . 소아마비 교정

코로나 바이러스는 중국을 향한 미국의 세균전 공격이었나? 코로나 바이러스는 중국 우한에서 누출된 바이러스가 아니고..미국 국토안보부 소속 미국 CIA와 CDC가 오랜동안 공들여 작업한 결과물..

신종코로나바이러스 이슈

2020. 3. 25. 15:27

https://blog.naver.com/finch1234/221872391851

번역하기

 

 

코로나 바이러스는 중국을 향한 세균전 공격이었나?

 

코로나 바이러스는 중국 우한에서 실수로 누출된 바이러스가 아니고..

 

미국 국토안보부 소속 미국 CIA와 CDC가 오랜동안 공들여 작업한 결과물 이라는것..

 

가장 최적인 시점을 작년 10월 18일 우한에서 개최된

 

밀리터리 게임 동안.. 미군을 통해서 우한에 퍼트렸다는것..

 

그러나..적국에 대한 바이러스 공격이 아이러니하게도

 

바로 미국 자신이 가장 큰 피해를 볼수 있다고 하네요.

 

 

운즈 리뷰에 올라온 기사인데요..

 

번역기 돌려서 올립니다.

 

의학용어가 있고 번역기를 돌려서 이상한 부분이

 

있더라도 양해 바랍니다.

 

저자는 유럽인이며..

 

미국 포트 데트릭에서 연구한적이 있는

 

바이러스 연구원 출신인듯 보입니다.

 

 

이글 올리느라고..밥도 못먹고 반나절 후딱 지나갔네요.

 

 

https://www.unz.com/article/was-coronavirus-a-biowarfare-attack-against-china/

Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?

[The following is the republication of several long and very detailed comments by an unidentified purported expert on biowarfare that or...

www.unz.com

 

코로나 바이러스는 중국을 향한 세균전 공격이었나?

 

Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?

 

[The following is the republication of several long and very detailed comments by an unidentified purported expert on biowarfare that originally appeared on a recent thread of the Saker blogsite.]

[Update: an investigation strongly suggests that the author’s claims regarding his personal background and professional expertise are accurate.]

 

 

나는 이것이 세균무기 라는 내 느낌 외에는 아무런 증거가 없다.

나는 40 년의 바이러스 방어 연구 경험을 가지고 있으며, 포트데트릭에서 박테리아 백신에 대해 연구 한 바 있으며, 에어로졸 감염 경로를 개발하고 면역의 상관 관계를 확립하기 위해 병인 다종 모델을 개발했다.

 

동물 관리, 에어로졸 노출, 시료 분석, 부검 및 조직 병리학 등을 포함한 모든 일을하는 원-스탑-샵 이었기 때문에 생물학적 방어 연구 프로그램 (BDRP)을위한 모든 백신을 위한 인체의 면역 보호 상관 관계를 확립하고 인간 집단의 면역 병리학 적 반응을 연구하는 풍토병 분야에 대한 프로그램을 연구했다.

 

나는 국토 안보부(DHS)의 초기 몇 년을 기억한다.. 당시 OPMA 정책에 따라 실적없는 공무원을 해고 할 수 없었다. 기관 자금 조달에 끔찍한 곤궁에 빠졌을 때 나는 기술 전문가로 여기에 왔다.

 

이 문제는 공무원들에게는 거의 알려지지 않았다. 그 문제는 해결 할 수 없었으며 일반적으로 매우 큰 피해를 발생시킬수있는 수준으로까지 올라갔다.

 

그러나 연방 정부 기관이 새로운 국토 안보부에 직원을 보내야 할 기회가 생겼는데.. DHS로 보내진 인적구성은 최악중에서 최악이었다.

 

DHS 연구소(NBACC)는 CIA (DHS의 일부임)에서 일하는 일부 사악한 미생물 학자들과 연결되어 있으며, 거기서 내가 본것들은 소름끼쳤다고 말하는것도 오히려 과소할정도였다.

 

오하이오 주 웨스트 제퍼슨에있는 배틀 메모리얼 인스티튜트 (Battle Memorial Institute)에서 NBACC의 후원하에 CIA를위한 DHS 계약하에 수행되었다고 확신한다.

 

내가 여기에 매우 목소리높여 반대했기 때문에 DHS에서는 나를 접근차단했지만.. DOD( 국방부)에서는 가능했다. DoD의 공격적인 작업은 불법적이고 비 윤리적이었다.

나는 그 후 10 년이 지난 지금 은퇴했으며 그 모든 것에서 멀리 떨어져 있다.

 

만일 내가 사실을 말하면..그들이 나에게 보복 할것이므로.. 나는 더 이상 말하지 않을 것이다.

 

그러나, 당신이 열심히 찾아보면.. 여전히 ​​인터넷에서 몇 가지 진실을 찾을 수 있습니다. 누군가에게는 화가날 일이겠지만.. 실제로 이것을 알아 내려고 노력하면 진실을 찾아낼수 있습니다. 현재 방송이나 주류언론 기사를 통해서는 진실을 찾아낼 가능성은 없어보입니다.

 

나는 COVID-19와 관련하여 눈이 번쩍 뜨이는 몇 가지 흥미로운 사실을 발견했다.

 

코로나 바이러스가 동물에게서 인간으로 직접 점프하여 감염시키는 자연 감염 일수도있다. 실제 관찰된 변형률 차이를 제외하고는 그랬을 가능성도 있다.

 

그러나.. 나는 중국 우한에서 자연발생적으로 생겼다고 보지 않는다. 중국 밖에서 시작되었고 미국에서 만들어진것이라고 생각한다.

 

실제로 미국에 현재 5 개의 균주가 있고 중국에 1 개의 균주가 있다면 중국에서 일어나기 전에 얼마 동안 미국에서 시작되어야 한다. 아마도 미국에서의 사망은 인플루엔자와 유사한 다른 질병에 기인 한 것으로 소급적 샘플링 조사를 해보면..알수있을것이다.

 

시간과 거리에 따른 균주의 GPS-Molecular 생물학 추적을 조합하는 것이 흥미로울 것이다. 우리는 모든 잠재적 인 사망을 추적하기 위해 지난 12 개월 동안 모든 폐 질환 관련 사망의 모든 표본에 접근 할 수 있어야 한다.

 

NBACC(미국 국토안보부산하 연구소)가 중요한 열쇠다. 어떤 사악한 것들이 자금 지원 받았는지 알아내야 한다.

 

바이러스는 시간이 지남에 따라 좀더 맹렬하게 변이가 일어날수 있다. 우리는 모든 잠재적 인 사망을 추적하기 위해 지난 12 개월 동안 모든 폐 질환 관련 사망의 모든 표본에 접근 할 수 있어야한다.

 

이 바이러스는 시간이 지남에 따라 더 악의적으로 변이되었을 수 있습니다. 특히, 조작 된 균주는 다수의 숙주를 거쳐.. 여러번 통과 하고 불안정해진다.

 

최악의 균주는 현장 수집 된 균주가 아닌 질병으로 사망 한 인간으로부터 채집된 균주이다. 끔찍하고 악한 볼튼이나 폼페오와 같은 사람들은 이것을 유용한것으로 여기고..중국에게 경제로 한방 먹여야 겠다고 생각할수 있다.

 

하지만..해결책없는 타국에 대한 바이러스 공격은 바로 나 자신이 가장 큰 피해자가 될수도 있다는걸 알아야하는데...미국정부는 어리석은 바보들로 가득차있는것 같다.

 

내 생각엔.. 2019 년 10 월 18일부터 27일까지 중국 우한에서 개최 된 제 7 회 CISM 밀리터리 게임 동안에 코로나 바이러스가 전파되었다고 생각한다.

 

왜냐면..시간상.. 기막히게 맞아떨어진다.

 

흥미롭게도, 나는 유럽에서 여러 우한 CISM 대회에 참가했고.. (26 년간 활동적이었습니다). 이 선수들이 누구인지 잘 알고 있다.

 

그 사람은 아마도 주방위군 일부로서 군사 활동 의무 기간 연장에 의해 훈련 비용을 지불받고 훈련에 참가한 참가자가 아니었을까 생각된다.

 

나는 매년 이런 사람들에게 졌으며.. 크로스 컨트리 스키에서 2 위를 차지했습니다.

 

소문에 의하며.. CISM의 미국 참가자들이 이상하게도 잔인하며.. 이사람들이 선수 인지 궁금했다고 합니다. 베네수엘라 홍수피해자들을 돕기위해 미군이 도우러갔지만.. 이때.. 우연히 모든 송전 소가 파괴 된 사실이 불현듯 떠올랐습니다.

 

그래서, 우한 밀리터리 게임이 있었다고 들었을때.. 이때가 외국인이 그 지역에 바이러스를 방출 할 수있는 완벽한 기회가 아니었을까 생각했습니다.

 

또한 모든 세균전쟁무기들이 반드시 치명적이지는 않다고 덧붙이고 싶습니다.

 

오히려 사망율이 낮으면서.. 그 나라의 의료자원과 생산성이 소모되고 망가지는것이 가장 최악의 결과를 가져옵니다.

 

따라서 감염성이 높지만.. 치명적이지 않은 질병이 더 무섭고.. 그 나라의 경제를 망치는 데는 완벽하죠.

 

트럼프 행정부가 주장한 바와 같이, 현재 그들은 가능한 모든걸 이용하여 미국의 경제 적들 (현재 미국 적들의 목록에서 중국이 1위에 올라와있다는것에 주목..)과 전쟁을 벌이고있습니다.

 

 

이것은 완벽하게 맞습니다. 그러나 결국 아이러니하게도 가장 먼저...미국 경제가 파괴 될 수 있다는것이죠.

 

나는 우한의 레벨4 바이러스 연구소에서 우연히 바이러스가 누출 된 것으로 생각되지 않습니다.

 

실제로, Porton Down 연구소 (영국의 포트데트릭같은곳)에서 불과 8k 떨어진 곳에서 노비촉 (Novichuk) 방출 사건이 일어났다는것..

 

영국과 미국은 이것을 러시아소행으로 주장했다..

 

어쨌든, CIA는 시간이 지남에 따라 패턴을 개발 한 것 같습니다. 내 직감에는, c-fos와 c-jun이 과도발현하여 암을 유발하는 인위적으로 만들어진 아데노 바이러스 라고 생각됩니다. . 실제 국립 암 연구소에서 어디에선가 발표 되었죠?

 

포트데트릭...우연의 일치겠지요.

 

이 작업을 계획하고 코로나 바이러스 작업을 다시 계획 할 때 CIA에서 진행되었다고 생각합니다.

 

나는 이란이 두번정도.. 북한 또한 공격을 받은적이 있다고 생각합니다. 또 러시아, 베네수엘라 및 쿠바도 그 영향을 받았다고 보여진다.

 

아데노 바이러스는 코로나 바이러스와 유사하고 쉽게 에어로졸 화되는 그런 바이러스이다 . 나는 감염과 의학적 치료를 위해.. 스스로 처방을 만들었습니다. 나말고 다른 사람, 즉 미국의 많은 적들이 특히 남미에서 암으로 사망했죠.

 

내 요점은 아마도 코로나 바이러스 작업과정은 꽤 오랫동안 진행되어 왔으며 꽤 좋은 결과를 얻었을 것입니다. 이란이 크게 타격을 받았다는 것은 또 다른 문제가되고있다. 우연의 결과로 보기엔 (미국 정부의 바보들)에게는 너무나 좋은것이죠.

 

이 바이러스에 대한 몇 가지 흥미로운 문제가 남아 있습니다. 중국에서 환자가없는 곳은 어디일까? 시간, 지리적 위치, 균주 동일성, 질병의 중증도를 연관시키는 연구가 수행될수 있습니다.

 

여기서 관찰할것들이 아주 많으며 수년간 많은 사람들을 바쁘게 할 것입니다.

 

 

아마도 아래의것들을 설명할수 있을것입니다.


“코로나 바이러스는 인간에게 심각한 질병을 일으키는 것으로 알려지지 않았습니다”

이것은 미국 정부의 CDC에서 발행한 특허 문구에서 발췌 한 것입니다.

링크 :
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/ko

 

이걸 본 순간 드는 의문... 왜 미국 정부는 인체에 무해한 바이러스를 특허 받았으며.. 포트데트릭의 미군 연구와 같은 실험실에서 연구하고 있는가?

또한..왜 SARS-CoV와 최근의 COVID-19인 SARS-CoV-2 가 있는가?

돼지열병은 이미 실험실에서 만들어진 인공 바이러스라는것이 주류와 WHO 이외에서 발표한 자료에서 나왔습니다.

에볼라와 심지어 HIV도 마찬가지입니다.


그렇다면.. 네이팜탄이나 지뢰 등의 사용금지 국제 조약처럼.. 생물학적 무기 실험실은 왜 국제조약으로 금지 되지 않는가? 하는 의문이 듭니다.

무해한 바이러스가 군대 실험실에서 연구되어지고.. 그것이 후에 공격적인 바이러스 무기로 둔갑하고 있는데...

 

I’ll throw my 2 cents in here. I have zero proof other than my gut feeling that this is a bioweapon. I do have 40 year of biodefense research experience behind me and worked at Fort Detrich on bacterial vaccines where I developed my own aerosol infection routes and developed multi-species models of pathogenesis to establish correlates of immunity. Because I was a one-stop shop doing everything including animal care, aerosol exposures, sample analysis, necropsy, and histopathology, etc. plus I had research programs in endemic areas studying the immunopathological response in human populations to establish immune correlates of protection for candidate vaccines all for the Biological Defense Research Program (BDRP).

I recall the early years when the Department of Homeland Security was stood up and they got the lion’s share of poorly performing ciivil servants un-fireable under the then OPMA policies. I was brought in as a technical expert as we were in dire straits for funding so I (and others) was lent out as a research prostitute. This is a little known problem with civil service employees. They are impossible to eliminate and generally rise to levels where they can cause the most damage. However, an opportunity arose whereby agencies in the Federal government had to contribute bodies to the new Department of Homeland Security (as no new vacancies were created when the agency was stood up meaning everyone had to sacrifice personnel) so most, if not all, employees sent to DHS were the worst of the worst. However, the DHS labs (specifically NBACC) also tied into some nefarious microbiologists working at the CIA (ostensibly part of DHS) and it is an understatement to say that what I saw being proposed horrified me. That work, I am certain was performed at Battle Memorial Institute in West Jefferson, Ohio under a DHS contract doing the work for the CIA under the auspices of NBACC. As I was very vocally opposed to this stuff I was removed from the secure access at DHS but not DoD to the offensive work which I had pointed out was not only illegal but unethical. I have since retired now more than 10 years and am far away from all of that. I won’t say more as they will reach out and seek retribution. But, if you look hard enough you can find still on the internet some references. There are some pissed off people out there should anyone care to actually do some leg work and try and figure this out. But, our news people no longer does this work so there is very little possibility of ever learning the truth.

However, that said, I notice some interesting things with COVID-19, that perked my ears up a bit. Yes, it could be a natural infection jumping species from bats to humans with a probable intermediate host, under conditions of human encroachment into world habitats. It is actually most likely to have been that, except for the strain differences being observed. That leads one to believe if it is in fact true, and I have no reason to doubt the Chinese on this, that it originated outside of China and it seems likely to have originated in the US. If, in fact, the US has 5 strains currently and China only one then it must have been percolating in the US for some time before it arose in China. Likely, deaths in the US were attributed to other diseases such as influenza and only retrospective sampling will determine this. It would be interesting to do a combination GPS-Molecular biology tracking of strains over time and distance. Also, a definite genetic analysis of strains over time would also be beneficial and can be done easily on every isolated strain. This would have value in attributing the course of the disease over time as part of a natural history study of the virus. We would need access to all samples of every lung disease related death for the past 12 months to be certain to track all potential deaths. NBACC is the key to figuring out what nefarious stuff was being funded.

It is possible that this virus has mutated over time to become more virulent. In particular engineered strains are generally unstable over multiple passages through multiple hosts. In my experience when testing strains for pathogenesis and lethality it is wise to first passage a frozen isolate several times through a susceptible animal host to regain full strength. If you test a lab isolate (usually frozen or lyophilized) generally it is wimpy unless you passage it at least 3 passages through an animal model. The worst strains are always those recovered from humans who died from the disease and not field collected strains. If this was perceived to be a useful agent from the likes of Bolton or Pompeo, who are terrible and evil people, then it is conceivable this was thought to teach the Chinese a lesson in economics. You have to be a complete idiot to release a virus for which you have no effective countermeasures but this administration seems to be filled with complete idiots. So, expecting normal behavior from these people is futile.

It could have been released during the 7th CISM military games held in Wuhan October 18-27, 2019 and that fits perfectly into the time scale for the actual infections. Now interestingly enough, I was a participant in several CISM competitions in Europe for skiing (I was on active duty for 26 years) so I am very well versed in who these athletes are. In general the best are Olympic competitors who are ostensibly part of the National Guard of their states who pay for their training by extended military active duty periods where their sole job is sports training. I used to lose every year to one of these guys and generally I placed a distant second place in cross country skiing. I also participated in the biathlon competitions and our soldiers were the very top level because they were in fact Olympic athletes. Rumor is that the US participants at CISM were atrocious which is very atypical so one wonders who these “athletes” were. I am reminded of the US military mission in Brazil to help flood victims which coincidentally was the exact same time that all the power transmission stations in Venezuela were destroyed. So, again a hackle or 2 rise when I heard about that. However, it is the perfect opportunity to release a virus on a target population.

I will also like to add that not all biological warfare agents are lethal. In fact, the worst are non-lethal as it consumes vast amounts of resources in treatment and lost productivity. Deaths are actually cheaper. So, a high communicability, low lethality disease is perfect for ruining an economy. As Trump’s administration claims they are waging war against economic enemies (currently China heads the list) using all possible actions. This fits perfectly into that; however, it may end up destroying the American economy which would be ironic.

I believe the Chinese response was exactly what a country would do if they were attacked with a bioweapon which explains a lot of their actions. I do not believe it was an accidental release from the BSL-4 labs in Wuhan. In fact, this may have been an irresistible opportunity similar to the alleged Novichuk release just 8 k away from Porton Down laboratories (the UK Fort Detrich). Interestingly, the potential release from PDL was never put forward as a logical explanation. Anyway, it sticks me that the CIA seems to have developed a pattern over time. As long as I am pushing my gut feelings I will throw out there the potential for a bioengineered adenovirus with c-fos and c-jun over expression which would cause sarcomas. That work was all published at the National Cancer Institute located where? Fort Detrich. I am certain it is just a coincidence. I can imagine the cackling going on at the CIA when planning this operation and again the coronavirus operation(s). I believe there were at least two attacks with Iran being the second and perhaps North Korea as well. However, evidence against it being a bioweapon is Russia, Venezuela, and Cuba are minimally affected. This could mean effective countermeasures or botched attacks. It is inconsistent though with the way the CIA operates.

Adenovirus is another virus similar to coronavirus in usage and easily aerosolized. I have made my own for over expression of medical treatments for wound infections. Has anyone other than myself noted that so many enemies of the US have died from sarcomas particularly in South America? My point is perhaps this stuff has been ongoing for quite some time and with some fairly good results. So, familiarity breeds contempt so as they gin more experience and begin to think this is good stuff, it is not out of the realm of possibility that this is in fact a bioweapon. That Iran was hit so hard is another hackle rising. It is just simply too good (for the idiots in the US government) to be a coincidence.

So, we are left with some interesting problems about this virus. Where was patient zero in China. What will be the results if a natural history study is conducted correlating geolocation, strain identity, severity of disease over time? Will that work be prevented? If so, that is yet another reason to be suspicious. Will it continue to mutate and what will be the outcome of this? Lots of good stuff to examine here and it will keep a lot of people busy for years.

Maybe you can explain this:
“Coronavirus have not previously been known to cause severe disease in humans”.
This is excerpt from the patent issued to CDC, US government. Link:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en

So the question for me is why should a harmless virus be patented by the US government and used for research in labs like US army research at Ft. Derick? That makes it military. Why is there then the SARS-CoV, and the latest COVID-19 which is SARS-CoV-2 ? The swineflu was likewise proven to be lab made at least in sources other than mainstream and WHO, the same was the case with Ebola, and even HIV.
It immediately raises the question of ban of biological weapons labs in my mind, by internatiopnal treaties just like a ban on the use of napalm, landmines and so on, since a harmless virus are researched in army labs and suddenly appears as aggresive viruses .

It is an interesting question. Under the bioweapons conference treaty no offensive work can legally be done and any signatory can demand an onsite inspection of facilities for verification at any time. To my knowledge that has never been demanded of the US. It has been done to Russia and China is not a signatory, nor is Israel or North Korea. We have been caught doing inappropriate biodefense research several times now but only because it became known and there were no consequences.

The slippery slope within DoD is to make a counter measure you have to try and look forwards and using intelligence based informatics to design offensive agents. In my opinion this is fallacious as we can’t make countermeasures against the normal 10 agents on the high threat list (since the program’s inception in 1942) other than anthrax and smallpox for which we have had effective vaccines for decades. Since 9/11 no new effective and/or safe vaccines have been been made for any of the rest of the agents on the list. This includes several far more likely biothreats like the plague, tularemia, glanders, brucella, Ebola, Marburg, etc. This was despite pouring billions into biodefense research most of which went to universities. When things cooled down the funding dried up as always. USAMRIID is currently shut down and may never re-open. But contracted services still go on and are funded using black money so not under the purview of Congress. So trying to make vaccines against biothreat agents that don’t exist seems ridiculous when the real threats, some of which the US has used in warfare, are still out there without effective preventatives. What happens is when you pour money into an area as happened after 9/11 all kinds of ridiculous stuff gets funded with very little oversight. The goal is to spend the money and no one really cares if any actual product is created. In fact, success means the demise of your program so the incentive is to drag it out for as long as funding is available. I had programs managed under DTRA funding that because I got new program managers as often as every 3 months had no clue or even any expertise in the matter and had zero idea of what we were doing. I got tired of doing a new dog and pony show each time I was assigned a new manager who usually was some very young recent PhD graduate with no experience at all. Often they were nebutistic appointments and daddy was a Congressman or Under Secretary.

The intelligence based decisions are as usual idiotic as is most intelligence coming out of the CIA and its affiliates. You get better intelligence reading PUBMED than you get out of any intelligence agencies. The microbiologists who work at the CIA and its contract companies were all military microbiologists who because they were essentially incompetent drifted over to the CIA. Then you have some IMHO ridiculous events. I recall when Ken Alibekov “defected” he spoonfed a bunch of made up BS which the CIA bought lock stock and barrel. I had working for me at the same time several former Soviet microbiologists (one of who was a senior researcher at Biopreparat) who were in fact the real deal and all told me he was a bullshit artist. One thing he peddled was a chimeric smallpox-Ebola and another a Ebola-anthrax. So the CIA immediately funded an effort to create chimeric viruses. To my knowledge these were unsuccessful however, the COVID-19 may be being caused by a chimeric virus. The only good reason to make a chimeric virus is to develop a attenuated strain for use as a vaccine. But, as often happens some attenuated mutants become more lethal as an unintended consequence. Another event was trying to force photo data from Iraq to prove they had an offensive bioweapons program. These guys had no clue what laboratory equipment was in actuality and had offered up a cooking truck with pots and pans etc. as proof. They were and I assume still are, idiots.

DoD programs are actually transparent and managed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Less transparent are the foreign stuff being funded under the Nunn-Lugar Act which includes the debacle of the “white elephant” lab and its satellite labs in the Republic of Georgia. No one will ever look into any of this but likely will end up blaming Russia or China.

They tend to underestimate their adversaries. China has an offensive program and if they get convinced they were attacked then I believe something nasty will be coming soon to the US. But, China is not stupid and won’t release a biothreat agent they have no preventative or treatment for. I also had several Chinese scientists working for me and I respect them immensely.

 

That should be PROMED for current infectious disease reporting around the world. It is exceptionally good and not funded or controlled by governments. PUBMED is for online publications which is also good but controlled by the government. I am fully aware of censorship of research papers by the US. I recall I wrote a letter to the editor of Science back in 1999 when the government decided to stockpile billions of doses of ciprofloxacin. I did a quick BLAST search and found that only a single base pair mutation in anthrax made it completely resistant to cipro. That letter was published and after 9/11 never seen again. There are other example such as the Canadian paper maybe also in 1999 showing that anthrax delivered in envelopes was not very effective. That one disappeared as well and the same as the Canadian paper where they were aerosolizing B. cereus spores out the back of a moving truck and using aerial infrared cameras demonstrated that these streams of aerosolized spores agglomerated into cloudlets which moved along in the wind and would usually avoid detector arrays which sampled airflow for aerosol particles. That is still the current state of the art for battlefield detection and that paper showed it to be ineffective at best. I can think of dozens of papers that were removed. After 9/11 any research paper that could be used by a foreign actor to develop better biothreat agents was rejected for publication outright. Almost none of my work was published after that except in classified reports which I believe were never read by anyone. I recall part of the madness in setting up NBACC was to generate very lengthy “white papers” that scrubbed through all published articles to assemble the complete picture for the then 10 threat agents. I wrote or edited two of those and they were immediately buried in some deep classified archive to the researchers who might benefit from this work could never actually use it. A complete waste of months and a ton of money. If you are perceiving that the US government biothreat programs are a complete shambles then you are not wrong.

I’ll go into that a bit more as well. It used to be in the military programs we were “command directed”. This means the military made a decision to make a vaccine against a perceived threat agent. They would assemble a research group assign them the mission and give 5 years funding to be continued if milestones (reasonable given the pittance of funding given). If you made progress then you got another 5 years of funding. That funding agency located at MRMC Fort Detrick was a Research area managed usually by a Major and a Captain, both microbiologists and experienced. Two people. There were 5 research area Directorates so a total of 10 program managers and a couple administrative colonels. This managed the entire DoD biothreat research programs and did it well. However, someone decided we needed an Agency to manage this stuff and DTRA which was funded by the Nunn-Lugar Act was already involved in the disassembly of Soviet nuclear capabilities so they wanted a bigger piece of the pie so absorbed the Research Directorates. The BDRP program at DTRA (basically identical as before) was now managed by over 400 contractors. The money came out of the research money we were supposed to be allocated.

 

After DTRA took over the funding was no longer Command Directed and we were all required to go out and fu-ind whatever funding we could hence why we made “deals” with DHS and the CIA. We went to an annual funding cycle instead of 5 years and never ending Gantt charts and reports. This was the age of 6 Sigma and the end of Management by Objective. We were also charged rent and had to pay for every service at our Institute including the security and even the library. Even our higher command MRMC stole 6% off the top to pay for pet projects unfunded by anyone with a brain. So, this became the age of entrepreneurial research and the end of productive research. Our commander, as an example, had no idea what we were doing at all and was shocked at all the “cool” stuff we were doing. This is the new breed of commander who manages by committee and never goes out walking the floors to visit labs. What the old school commanders call management by walking around and poking your nose into everything. But now these guys sit in their office and are fed whatever the REMFs decide they should hear. This is management in the US government as a whole and there are so many hidden agendas and internal conflicts between programs it is difficult to describe just how awful it is to try and do research in that environment. A lot of the worst of those commanders or research Division Directors went on to be current heads of HHS, CDC, and their undersecretaries, etc. which explains why those agencies are so screwed up and why there is such a horrible response to this viru

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

태그#코로나..미국CIA..CDC..세균무기..바이오웨폰..폼페이오#..볼턴

[출처] 코로나 바이러스는 중국을 향한 미국의 세균전 공격이었나? 코로나 바이러스는 중국 우한에서 누출된 바이러스가 아니고..미국 국토안보부 소속 미국 CIA와 CDC가 오랜동안 공들여 작업한 결과물..|작성자 때가올지니깨어있으라

'4 . 소아마비 교정' 카테고리의 다른 글

CDC가 포트데트릭을 폐쇄명령을  (0) 2020.04.25
감시 자본주의  (0) 2020.04.25
CIA와 CDC 가 작업  (0) 2020.04.25
반 트럼프 쿠데타  (0) 2020.04.25
다르파  (0) 2020.04.25
ID2020  (0) 2020.04.25
posted by 사용자 dlpul

댓글을 달아 주세요